A reply to mcgill.ca

This is a reply to this article by Jonathan Jarry. So, Jonathan, the first thing you claim is that my study was „deeply flawed“. It’s peer-reviewed science in a 100-year-old journal. You’re writing a blog. Then you go on to make comments about me, keeping to proclaim that this paragraph was not ad hominem. Yet,„A reply to mcgill.ca“ weiterlesen

Erstelle eine Website wie diese mit WordPress.com
Jetzt starten